New tech gets chatter
4 Oct 2016
My text editor of choice, TextMate, is old. Version 1 was released in 2004. Version 2 was announced in 2009 and has been in alpha & beta release since 2012. TextMate is old enough that a whole new generation of text editors have emerged and eclipsed it, most notably Sublime Text and Atom. They have built upon TextMate's successes and learned from its pain points. But I continue to use TextMate, and will continue to TextMate. Because TextMate works for me.
You don't hear about TextMate because TextMate is old. What would I tweet? Still using TextMate. Still good. TextMate's problems are well known. Its hacky solutions are documented. Most everything's been covered.
Meanwhile, Atom is entirely new. Its problems are new problems. When you find a solution, you might be the first one to discover it. That's pretty special. That's worth tweeting.
Seeing all the talk around Atom chips away at the confidence I have in TextMate. I feel like a stubborn luddite, clinging on to my 2005 flip-phone because I can see the numbers better. But that feeling, of missing-out because others are talking about it, is just a perceived social pressure, a herd behavior.
As a tech worker, I would like to think I am a highly rational being of pure logic. But I am just as susceptible to emotions as the rest of the muggles. So I recognize and tune-out hubbub and go with what I know. Because it continues to work, even though continuing to work isn't worthy of mention.
If you use React and you like it: great. But if you don't use React (or whatever hot new tech), and you feel like you should: don't worry about it. You are perfectly okay to stick with what works for you. The more you use something, the clearer its pain points become. Try new technologies when you're ready to address those pain points. Don't feel obligated to change your workflow because of chatter. New tech gets chatter, but that doesn't make it any better.